Man who threw rocks and bottles at neighbour's car in landed home parking dispute gets jail

The dispute began when the neighbour parked in front of the offender's house, and a scuffle broke out between them. Advertisement Singapore Man who threw rocks and bottles at neighbour's car in landed home parking dispute gets jail The dispute began when the neighbour parked in a space outside the offender's house that was open to anyone. Seah Chin Leong arriving at the State Courts on Feb 9, 2026. (Photo: CNA/Jeremy Long) New: You can now listen to articles. This audio is generated by an AI tool. Lydia Lam Lydia Lam 24 Feb 2026 04:43PM (Updated: 24 Feb 2026 04:50PM) Bookmark Bookmark Share WhatsApp Telegram Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Set CNA as your preferred source on Google Add CNA as a trusted source to help Google better understand and surface our content in search results. Read a summary of this article on FAST. Get bite-sized news via a newcards interface. Give it a try. Click here to return to FAST Tap here to return to FAST FAST SINGAPORE: A man who threw rocks and glass bottles at his neighbour's car in a year-long parking dispute at a landed estate in Serangoon was sentenced to a week's jail and a fine of S$7,500 (US$5,920) on Tuesday (Feb 24).Seah Chin Leong, a 43-year-old Singaporean, had pleaded guilty earlier this month to four charges which include mischief, affray and the use of abusive words. Fourteen other charges were considered in sentencing.Seah had scuffled with his neighbour after the latter parked in a space in front of his house.District Judge Adam Nakhoda said on Tuesday that the parking spot was open to anyone, including Seah's neighbours, to use."Had cooler minds prevailed, and the accused accepted that there was no right for him to park at one of the parking spots, he would not be in this situation today," said the judge.He cited the prosecution's submission that people live in close proximity with one another due to the nature of housing in Singapore and it is inevitable that neighbourly disputes arise.However, these cannot be resolved by committing offences against person or property, said the judge.THE CASESeah had a dispute with his next-door neighbour since 2024 over parking issues.He confronted his neighbour about the latter parking his car outside Seah's house at about 3am on Aug 1, 2024, and a scuffle broke out.Seah also threw two glass bottles from his house towards his neighbour's car in the early hours of Nov 5, 2024. The vehicle was parked along the road outside Seah's house.A bottle hit the rear of the car, with repairs costing about S$894.Multiple police reports were filed by the neighbouring family, including over an incident past 2am on Christmas Day in 2024 where Seah threw rocks at the neighbour's family car.In another incident at about 3.30am on Feb 22, 2025, Seah was burning joss paper in an incense bin on the public road outside his house, near his neighbour's family car.A member from the neighbouring family used a garden sprayer from within their house compound to douse the burning paper, concerned that the fire could damage the car.A verbal dispute broke out, and Seah hit his neighbour's gate with a metal stick. The estimated cost of replacing the gate is S$1,000 to S$2,000.The neighbour commenced civil actions against Seah, which culminated in a settlement where Seah paid about S$3,400 for the damage caused.He also sold his house and moved out voluntarily to avoid further disputes and conflicts with his neighbours.In sentencing, Judge Nakhoda said he did not find the decision to move out to be mitigating since Seah continued to reoffend in the year between him selling the house and the time he actually moved out.Seah's lawyer had argued that there was an element of provocation for the incense bin incident, saying it was a very sensitive matter.However, the judge found that a question remains as to why Seah chose to burn joss paper in proximity to his neighbour's car."It would appear that this was itself a microaggression on the part of the accused," said Judge Nakhoda, rejecting the argument that there was provocation warranting a "discount".He also noted the persistence of Seah's offending and multiple charges taken into consideration, with the series of conduct they represent amounting to an aggravating factor that would warrant a stiffer sentence.He allowed Seah to defer his sentence to March.For mischief, Seah could have been jailed for up to two years, fined, or both.For affray, he could have been jailed for up to a year, fined up to S$5,000, or both.For using abusive words, he could have been jailed for up to six months, fined up to S$5,000, or both. Source: CNA/ll Sign up for our newsletters Get our pick of top stories and thought-provoking articles in your inbox Subscribe here Get the CNA app Stay updated with notifications for breaking news and our best stories Download here Get WhatsApp alerts Join our channel for the top reads for the day on your preferred chat app Join here Related Topics court Crime Advertisement Also worth reading Content is loading... Advertisement Expand to read the full story Get bite-sized news via a newcards interface. Giv